The term “human sustainability” is recent in the corporate world, but its meaning is not new. Assuming that people consumers, suppliers, partners, leaders and especially employees 5 are at the center of organizations, a paradigm shift must happen so that the human capital of organizations is seen and valued.
According to the global consulting firm Deloitte, human sustainability can be defined as the need for organizations to focus less on how people can benefit them and more on how organizations themselves can benefit these people. That is, it is a new approach in which companies start to create a sustainable corporate environment, allowing individuals to perform their roles in the best possible way.
According to the data collected from interviews with leaders, there is a gap between those who recognize the importance of this topic and those who exercise it on a daily basis. In the survey, 76% of respondents said they consider human sustainability important for the business, but only 46% reported to be implementing some measure in this regard, while other 10% already invest in large-scale actions.
So how do you put it into practice? The CEO of CKZ Diversity and author of the book “Vies Unconscious”, Cris Kerr explains that the first and most important step is to measure what are the impacts of a bad corporate environment for people in the company's results and how much it costs, in the end, absenteeism, demotivation, low productivity, turnover, consulting and training.
“One of the challenges for human sustainability is that one still privileges a look only at the technical results within companies and so people are evaluated. I remember a training I gave to an HR team on how the work environment can influence hormonal discharges. Soon after, two people resigned from this company, and the leaders brought complaints to me. My answer was that the problem was not training and not people, but most likely the leadership of”, comments the expert and pioneer in DIEP Diversity, Inclusion, Equity and Belonging.
According to Cris Kerr, it is common for people to reach leadership positions for their technical qualities and, when playing this role, present differences in behavioral issues. Often, managers forget the importance of holding individual meetings, giving constant feedback and creating a welcoming environment of empathy and inclusion. Instead, the focus is only on pressure for results.
“In another example, a leadership that participated in a training told me that he had many problems with the people on his team, both men and women had not been performing well. I soon asked: 'Do you have meetings with them? Have moments one-to-one?’. The person replied: I have meetings once with the whole team and I always say that if they have something urgent, they can look for me’, he says.
The CEO of CKZ adds that often, erroneously, managers convey an idea that they are super busy, that they do not have time for trivial matters. Thus, their teams end up preferring to do the wrong tasks than to talk and ask their questions. “This leadership did not do this because it was someone bad, but out of habit and because the organization never looked at its behavioral profile. Therefore, it is essential to bring training for inclusive leadership, in addition to include in performance evaluations, 360 feedback, in which all people are evaluated by all levels of the hierarchy, equally, complete Cris.
“In addition, it involves daily how to use more expressions like 'Congratulations on the delivery and 'thank you for the work’. Or, if the task needs adjustments, we need to correct the route a little, we will work together on it’. The culture of a company is mainly the way people behave. Therefore, human sustainability must be measured and placed as a goal in order to ensure a healthy environment so that people can return home better than when they arrived at work”, concludes the expert.
Therefore, human sustainability is directly related to the way companies treat the people in their business. This goes through a deep look of reevaluation of behavioral performance metrics of leadership and the impacts of turnover and absenteeism for company finances.